SC Reverts to Original Grandeur, Dismantles Glass Partitions at Bar's Request

In a significant initiative aimed at preserving its architectural heritage and enhancing accessibility, the Supreme Court of India has made the decision to remove the glass glazing previously installed in front of Courtrooms 1 to 5. This action responds to concerns expressed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA), who emphasized issues related to reduced corridor space, visibility, and the disruption of the court's historical elegance. Following thorough deliberation, the Full Court has resolved to dismantle the partitions that were introduced during the term of former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, thereby restoring the court’s traditional layout.

NEW DELHI, June 22, 2025

In a pivotal move to uphold the historical and architectural integrity of India’s apex judicial institution, the Supreme Court administration has decided to remove the glass glazing installed in front of Courtrooms 1 to 5. This decision follows a unanimous resolution by the Full Court, made after reviewing strong representations from key bar associations.
 

What Prompted the Decision?

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) submitted formal representations expressing concern.

They cited issues such as:

• Loss of the court’s original grandeur and aesthetic appeal
• Reduced visibility inside the corridors
• Restricted movement and accessibility, especially during peak hours

Official Statement

An official press release issued Saturday stated:

“The Full Court of the Supreme Court of India acknowledged the representations received from SCBA and SCAORA... After thorough deliberation on the concerns raised, the Full Court has decided to remove the glass glazing.”

Background: Why Was the Glazing Installed?

The glass partitions were installed during the tenure of former Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, intended to:

• Modernize the corridors
• Introduce air-conditioning and enhance climate control

Concerns Raised by the Bar (December 2024)

The SCBA approached then Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna urging removal

They highlighted:

• Narrowed corridor space due to the partitions
• Difficulty in movement for lawyers, clerks, interns, and litigants
• Negative impact on the historic ambiance of the court

Response from the Legal Community

The decision to remove the glass is being widely welcomed as a restorative step

Senior advocates and legal experts praise the move as:

• A balance between modernization and tradition
• A responsive approach to the needs of the legal fraternity

What’s Next?

• While no formal timeline has been announced for the removal process,
• The court administration has assured:
• The work will be carried out efficiently
• Minimal disruption to ongoing court proceedings

Why This Matters

This marks a noteworthy precedent in judicial infrastructure planning—highlighting the value of consultation, tradition, and functionality in preserving the dignity of India's highest court.

As the Supreme Court moves to reclaim its architectural legacy, this decision reflects more than just structural change; it represents a reaffirmation of the values, history, and accessibility that define India’s highest temple of justice.