AIIMS Faces Delhi HC Scrutiny Over INI-CET Spot Round
The Delhi High Court has sought AIIMS’ response on why a spot round for INI-CET January 2025 session was not conducted, raising concerns over fairness.

The Delhi High Court has sought an explanation from AIIMS regarding the absence of a spot round for the INI-CET January 2025 session. This development has raised concerns among medical aspirants who were expecting a final opportunity for admission. The court's intervention came after students questioned why vacant seats were not filled through a spot round despite it being a standard practice in past admission cycles.
Key Concerns Raised by the Delhi High Court
Fairness of the Admission Process:
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining transparency in the INI-CET selection process.
Students who had been waiting for a spot round to secure admission expressed disappointment over the lack of clarity.
The absence of a final round may have led to vacant seats going unutilized.
Previous Spot Round Practices:
Traditionally, AIIMS has conducted spot rounds for filling vacant seats in various medical programs.
The court has asked AIIMS to clarify whether this decision was based on a change in policy or an administrative lapse.
Many students who had hopes of securing a seat have been left uncertain about their future.
Demand for a Justified Explanation:
The Delhi High Court has instructed AIIMS to provide a detailed response regarding the decision.
The court will assess whether the move aligns with the existing INI-CET admission framework.
If necessary, AIIMS may be directed to reconsider its approach to spot round admissions.
Impact on INI-CET Aspirants
Missed Admission Opportunities:
Several students were left without a chance to compete for vacant seats due to the cancellation of the spot round.
This has caused frustration among candidates who had cleared the INI-CET but were waiting for the final selection process.
Potential Policy Reforms:
The hearing may result in AIIMS introducing a clearer framework for future INI-CET admissions.
If the court deems the decision unfair, AIIMS may be asked to reintroduce spot rounds for future sessions.
Legal Precedent for Medical Admissions:
The case highlights the increasing role of the judiciary in ensuring transparency in medical entrance exams.
Future admission cycles may see stricter regulations to prevent similar disputes.
Conclusion
The Delhi High Court’s intervention in the INI-CET January 2025 admission process has put AIIMS under scrutiny. The response from AIIMS will determine whether the cancellation of the spot round was justified or if corrective actions are needed. This case could potentially shape future INI-CET admission policies, ensuring that vacant seats are fairly allocated.
